For Internet service providers, e-crime is not cheap.
The problem of customers' compromised computers sending spam can
dramatically impact an ISP's bottom line, according to a survey by
Osterman Research released today: Nearly 40 percent of ISPs had
their IP addresses blacklisted by the Real Time Blackhole Lists
(RBLs) in the past year. A blacklisted mail server could lead to
dropped e-mail -- and an increase in support calls to the ISP.
The outbound spam issue highlighted by the report is one example
of the business issues that compromised computers pose for ISPs.
One in six providers spends more than USD 100,000 attempting to
prevent outbound spam from impacting their business, according to
the report, which was funded by e-mail security service
CommTouch.
"I haven't found a service provider that does not have at least
a couple of people tasked with dealing with outbound spam," says
Asaf Greiner, vice president of product for CommTouch. "If you
don't deal with outbound spam, you run the risk of having your IPs
blocked."
Nearly half of respondents said outbound spam adds to their
costs of doing business, wastes time for the IT departments,
damages their reputations, and affects their customers' service
levels.
The outbound spam problem is just one way Internet service
providers are being driven by regulatory and market forces to pay
more attention to the security of their customers' networks. Some
Internet service providers have already embarked on initiatives to
clean the traffic flowing through their systems. ISPs in Australia,
for instance, have signed an agreement to notify consumers if a PC
is compromised by malicious software. Those ISPs could curtail the
compromised computer's bandwidth to slow the spread of harmful
code.
In the Netherlands, more than a dozen ISPs have agreed to
exchange information about security issues, notify users if their
system is compromised, and block traffic from infected systems,
essentially quarantining users.
"I am a firm believer in the role of ISPs helping to protect
customers against security threats," said Jose Nazario, senior
researcher at network security firm Arbor Networks, in a recent
interview. "It needs to go beyond the practices that we have seen
in the past, beyond blocking traffic and protecting the network, to
protecting customers themselves. If they are spamming the network,
they are going to get their traffic dropped. That is a significant
business impact."
ISPs' security measures, however, have to strike a delicate
balance: Block too many compromised users and the support calls
could beggar the business, but block too few and the ISP runs the
risk of government intervention or being added to the blacklists. A
single customer call can cost an ISP as much as the profit from the
customer over two years, says Nazario.
Yet if large ISPs tackle the issue of compromised computers in
their networks, the problem of spam is solvable, according to a
paper presented this week at the Workshop on the Economics of
Information Security.