When the Society for Information Management
asked CIOs and other members to identify the skills they value most
among both entry-level and midlevel hires, guess which technology
competencies came out on top?
Hint: none.
In fact, a technical skill barely cracked the top 10.
Ethics and morals topped both employer wish lists, followed by such
attributes as critical thinking and problem solving, collaboration
and team-building, oral and written communications, and user
relationship management. For entry-level employees, application
development (No. 10), functional area knowledge (No. 12), database
(No. 14), and system analysis (No. 15) were the technical skills
most prized by tech employers. For midlevel hires, business
analysis (No. 11) and project planning/budgeting (No. 13) were
highest ranked among traditional business technology roles.
What gives? Doesn’t technology expertise matter to business
technology organizations anymore?
Of course it does. But in a global economy where technical
functions are often handed off to contractors, and where companies
increasingly are aligning their IT with suppliers, partners, and
customers, employers are looking for people who can manage
relationships and excel as part of far-flung teams, not just hammer
out internal system and project requirements. As mentioned in a
previous column, the skill set CIOs tend to look for breaks down
roughly to one-third technology, one-third business, one-third
leadership, though that mix applies more to senior business
technology management than to entry-level people.
The SIM survey results, compiled in June and released this month,
based on responses from 291 senior business technology execs,
didn’t surprise Jerry Luftman, who led the research as
SIM’s VP of academic affairs. For the past five years,
Luftman says, tech employers have been saying they want to imbue
their organizations with more business, industry, and interpersonal
capabilities. “What surprises me is how little is being done
to address it,” he says. “We are just so slow to
respond.”
A bit surprising to me is the top priority tech employers place on
ethics, even in a corporate environment leery of the next Enron or
WorldCom debacle. But then consider the damage unethical and
disgruntled tech pros can wreak on their companies through their
misuse and manipulation of critical systems, and you start to
understand why ethics is paramount.
CIOs are clearly saying they’re looking for character,
intellect, and social savvy more than tech specialization, even if
their organizations’ job board ads—for Java software
engineers, data analysts, network architects, and the
like—continue to be very specific in their technical
requirements. It’s not that companies want tech neophytes.
But with many exceptions (try training someone as a SAS expert who
doesn’t have the statistical chops), they think they can
bring their people up to speed on the latest languages, systems,
and standards. Employers want well-rounded business pros with a
deep technology grounding.
CIOs say they can’t find such people, who are especially
important in managing the technocrats that companies use for
contract work, both domestically and offshore. (The execs surveyed
by SIM say their organizations plan to allocate a higher percentage
of their IT budgets to offshore outsourcing next year than they
have in past years—5.6% in 2009 compared with 3.3% in 2008
and 1.7% in 2005.) Many frustrated workers say employers
aren’t looking hard enough for good people at home, or their
expectations are unrealistic—that is, most Renaissance men
and women won’t work for $40K a year plus benefits.
Regardless of your take on the so-called IT talent shortage, the
folks doing the hiring (and promotion) have spoken: They value
people whose depth isn’t just measured by a technical cert.
It’s incumbent on employers and employees alike to harden
those “soft” skills.