On the eve of the announcement of the Business Objects (BO)
acquisition, SAP CEO Henning Kagermann said he wasn’t under
“any pressure” to make a large acquisition. But many
believe otherwise. Says Andreas Bitterer, research vice president
for the Business Intelligence Group at Gartner, “It is
certainly a reaction to Oracle’s Hyperion acquisition. SAP
used to acquire smaller companies. However, it changed its strategy
with the Pilot acquisition. BO offers end-to-end BI solutions for
end users.” SAP’s acquisition of Pilot, a strategy
management software company, strengthened the parent
company’s CRM offerings.
Nilotpal Chakravarti, senior analyst, Springboard Research, feels
that the recent consolidation in the BI industry made it impossible
for SAP to ignore the gaps in its BI offerings.
“Oracle’s purchase of Hyperion and Siebel, and
Microsoft’s recent BI announcements, were putting pressure on
SAP since their BI story was comparatively weak.” Oracle
acquired Hyperion, a leader in performance management, in March
2007, while Siebel, a leading CRM provider, was acquired in June
2006. According to Frost & Sullivan, the global BI market is
currently pegged at more than $6.67 billion.
Whether a reactionary move or not, there is much speculation about
how SAP would leverage the acquisition for business gains. The
acquisition this time is of a much larger scale than those SAP has
been used to. “The acquisition is somewhat of a strategy
shift for SAP since they have either built their own analytic tools
or acquired relatively small companies. The purchase in June 2007
of OutlookSoft (a provider of integrated planning, budgeting and
forecasting tools, chiefly aimed at company CFOs) was a sign that
this strategy would change,” says Chakravarti.
SAP’s move seems to be driven by the company’s stated
strategy (announced in 2005) of doubling the addressable market by
2010. The acquisition will boost SAP’s user base to 78,000,
bringing it closer to its goal of achieving a customer base of
100,000 by 2010.
The fact that BO’s product roadmap has been closely aligned
with that of SAP’s should ease matters for the software
giant. BO has been a third-party reporting solution for SAP R3 and
SAP BW, SAP’s better known enterprise application and
business warehouse software respectively. “Last year BO
released BO BI 2 for SAP solutions. Many SAP R3 users in India have
deployed BAPI (Business Application Programming Interfaces) from
Business Objects as it gives them access to data not only within
SAP, but also non-SAP applications,” says T R Madan Mohan,
director of consulting information communication & technology
practice, Frost & Sullivan.
According to Mohan, Microsoft and Oracle had been nibbling away at
BO’s license and maintenance revenues. “By bundling
BO’s CRM analytical tools with the ERP tools of SAP, the two
companies will benefit immensely.”
While SAP has said that it would integrate with BO on the
horizontal and analytics domains, analysts don’t rule out a
certain amount of portfolio rationalization. Says Gartner’s
Bitterer, “SAP already has three and BO two products under
the BI portfolio. SAP customers will have to decide whether to use
BO’s BI or stick to Business Explorer (SAP’s BI
tool).”
The BO acquisition also dovetails well into SAP’s Software as
Service (SaaS) strategy. Chakravarti explains: “BO is
probably the most aggressive BI provider on the SaaS platform, and
it could continue pushing this strategy since BO will continue to
operate independently.”
SAP was traditionally focused on ERP and back office applications.
While it has BI capabilities, the BO acquisition allows SAP a
relatively easy route to expand its footprint in one of the growth
areas of the enterprise applications market. “Outside of the
financial considerations, Springboard views this as a very
favorable acquisition for SAP from a strategy perspective,”
says Chakravarti.Bitterer and Mohan believe that both companies
will have to work hard to understand and make the acquisition work
as they operate on different turfs.